
On Friday I had two separate customers come in and talk to Craig and I about weather or not people still bought single issue back issues and comics, or if trades were taking over. One customer even suggested that I discuss this on my blog.
Well Jeff, it's a great idea. So here goes. First, let me start off with a quick survey - what are YOU reading? (if this poll jumps to the bottom of the post, I have no idea why, as I'm an HTML idot, but please scroll down there and fill it out)
7 comments:
Hi, Neptune! Hate to see you took me off your blogroll, but I haven't been very active in a while, thanks to some personal issues, so I understand.
I wanted to weigh-in on this one because this is a pretty frequent "argument" in some circles and has been for years and years.
I grew up in the 1970s-80s, and was there when the graphic novel came into form. It wasn't so much (from my recollection) that shop owners feared the new format - there were all sorts of new formats back then (prestige, bookshelf, etc.), not to mention all sorts of experimental stuff (that Marvel computer-generated GN - was that Iron Man? - Eclipse did one rendered completely in pencils, etc.), imports (Moebius books, Lone Wolf & Cub, Akira, Kamui) - it was that they didn't think they would sell because of the high prices. But they did - especially the collections of back issues and mini-series.
The big problem came about when Dave Sim released the phonebook collections of Cerebus and circumvented Diamond completely, distributing it on his own via direct mail. That was a free-for-all, head-over-heels debacle which still (barely) resonates today and brought up all kinds of bad juju because by that point (or right around the same time), the big book chains had started carrying graphic novels too (Waldenbooks, Borders, etc.), and that is what scared the heck out of shop owners!
I purchase GNs whenever there's something I want, but seeing as how I do collect (as much for investment as for the titles I enjoy) and GNs rarely go up in value (only Watchmen first-printing really ever did significantly), I'll wait until I get a small windfall or something and can actually afford it before I pick it up.
Single issues I buy every month.
Invincible and Powers are "non-superhero" graphic novels? Well, maybe Powers is, but Invincible seems like straight-up superhero fare, to me.
I buy lots of new comics, and often buy hardcover collections when they come out. I only buy trades of a few things, and mostly things I'm not buying as comics (Powers, for instance). I prefer hardcovers to trades because of their durability. I tend to avoid black-and-white reprints because I prefer color.
I do buy a number of back issues, of old comics I enjoy, and I tend to prefer them to trade collections because, again, they're more durable. For the most part I'll even take the low print quality over the poor durability of paperbacks.
So I buy a little of everything, but mainly with an eye towards keeping stuff on my bookshelf, in good condition, for years to come.
manodogs - glad to see you're back. Let me know when you get your blog rolling again and I can add you.
the Cerebus situation sure helps explain why some retailers get so angry when they find out that publishers are selling stuff direct. Interesting!
Michael - I meant more independant than non-superhero, since yes, Invincible is a superhero comic and we even have it shelved in our graphic novel area in the superhero section. Still, the comic of that goes from selling 0-2 issues where we can sell 5 copies of the newest trade paperback within the first few months of the trade's release.
You are very similar to a lot of my customers. You buy some back issues, lots of new comis, and some trades. It's a nice mix that helps keep us comic retailers going! Thanks!
I prefer to buy back issues of stuff (I'm a completist)... HOWEVER, if I wanna get into a series and its on issue #60, I'll buy the trades – I prefer to read the stories that way. I wouldn't buy a couple issues, then buy trades. If I'm reading a series, I'll want the next issue in my grubby paws ASAP.
Thanks for the warm re-welcome, Lisa! We're back up and going now, just had some slow weeks throughout the last few months because the site changed hosts and because of some legal "problems"...
Anyway, I'm glad the whole Dave Sim bit helped historically. I forgot to mention that it really put him on your good friend, Steve Geppi's, er, ah... "poo" list. He and Geppi were at each other's throats over this whole thing, with Geppi threatening to cancel (or did, I forget) at least one of the other Aardvark-Vanaheim imprints (Ms. Tree, I think) and the fit hit the shan from there.
Sim, Laird & Eastman (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles), and a whole host of other cats got together and did this whole Creative Rights Summit - the effects of which are still very much resonating throughout the industry today, having led to the founding of Image and new imprints at DC for creator-owned properties.
All told, Dave Sim is one of the top-three most important people in comics since Stan Lee, with Frank Miller being the other and, well you know, I always like to leave one slot open just to avoid controversy...
Graphic Novels Rule Comics Drool!
My big thing is that I care about story and I hate just reading part of a story. It's like I would never watch just part of a TV show. I would watch a whole episode. So with comics I want to read a full story-arc at once not in bits and pieces. Plus graphic novels look better on my shelf then those ugly comic boxes.
Post a Comment